Do you realize that by publishing a post on Hive and then pasting it on Blurt you are promoting a blockchain that censors its users?

I have decided to make controversial changes to the algorithm of my bot that will promote users who publish their posts on Blurt first. When you paste your post from another blockchain you will only receive a minimal upvote of 0.01%, just like when you use blog20, fast cash out service.

A few days ago I saw a discussion on discord regarding the @blurtbooster bot. I like such an idea because it is the best way to distribute BLURT, such non-stop distribution was in my mind from the very beginning here, that's why I vote with the help of the bot .

initblurt/socialgraph are community resources and everyone who posts here should get one upvote a day. I am ready to forget my demands that these 55M needs to be returned to DAO, but the bot algorithm should be open source, votes on witnesses should be withdrawn and BLURT from these accounts should be transferred to account that requires multisignature, I want to have one of the keys.

At the moment - one person has 55M printed BLURT at his disposal and uses them for his own financial gain and control of witnesses.

Today this person delegated these funds to the bot, tomorrow he can do a power down and sell everything on markets, which will destroy all the investors who bought BLURT with their hard earned money.

@saboin, this will help you determine if 24 hours have passed since the author's last post


var steem = require('@blurtfoundation/blurtjs');
steem.api.setOptions({url: 'https://blurtrpc.actifit.io/'});

function secondPost(created) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
steem.api.getDiscussionsByAuthorBeforeDate('AUTHOR', null, new Date().toISOString().split('.')[0] , 5, function(err, result) {
if (err) reject(err);
const time =result[1].created;
resolve(time);
});
});
}
(async function() {
const val = await secondPost('AUTHOR');
console.log("second post publish time", val);
}) ();