At 13:07 you mentioned info in the video descrip, but it's not there. Maybe add it here as a comment on the video..? Thanx for these vids though Jin, I know that they enlighten people :)
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Ahh Ken, thanks for pointing that out!
There are many ways to stop paying council tax. We can play the legal game of evidencing such things as the fraud happening, like this lady aka does https://odysee.com/@januszkowalskii1979:e/UK-No-Obligation-to-Pay-Council-Tax:3
The basic premise is to proof to the Courts that you know they've been operating on fraud. We must now go back to the Cestui Que Vie Act 1666 and the setting up of the first trusts via Unam Sanctum. This London Fire event was brought in so that the CQV act could be established. If we look at the act, the Crown basically created a trust under the SURNAME (this is always in all caps, signifying it not to be English, which is a wordmark, cannot be read, a foreign language...what does it actually read, and what does it actually signify?), found on the birth certificate assumed by the individual unawares.
We can then head over to the Acts of Union 1707, which blatantly tell us that the United Kingdom (proper appeareance is UNITED KINGDOM - wordmark, not english, cannot be read, so why is this non-english-foreign-sign-pictorial-wordmark being used in all legal systems?) was created in 1707. The document also shows us that the UK jurisdiction is a foreign jurisdiction/occupation of the native land of England and it's inherent laws of the land/common law.
These two evidence of frauds is enough to have The Enemy's minions hung for high treason. But they cannot owned up to this in court, they cannot utter a single word of this, otherwise the entire legal system must be exposed.
We can go a stage further by bringing proof of fraud with intent (Malfeasance) within all state documents, by going back to the language manuals that codify the English language, and accepted as a world wide standards of leading legal organizations. The manuals we look at is the Chigaco Manual of styles 16th edition and the Oxford Manual of Styles. In no where does it say in the manuals that all-caps "words" exists as true English, instead it appears under the "foreign languages" chapters of Chicago Manual of Styles; in the Oxford manual of styles this isn't even included...goes to show how far the corruption goes. All courts agree upon the validity of the Chicago Manual of styles world wide.
We can then bring their attention to Blacks Law Dictionary, 4th, 5th and 6th edition (these are the dictionaries of the legal realm; which uses English words but entirely different meanings) to the meanings of the words Human, Person, Persona. And then evidencing all this, we have the entire fraud at hand.
I can then go to UK company house and search up the "name" that comes with the council tax letter. We can see that the "name" is actually a company, with it's own directors and managers, start and closing dates. What the heck??? If we go further ahead and do a search on the ISIN (International Securities Identification Number - in North America sides it's called CUSIP) on places like GM utilities (i think thats the site), we are then given more information on what is actually going on. The Birth certificate appears to be a banking contract sold on the world markets...the name on the birth certificate is a company...so who am i???
You can then go back and forth with your council arguing etc etc, of course they will not accept, and if you don't pay they will of course send baliffs, whom are easy to deal with in England.
But a more simplier way is....if we know our language...if we know proper English from wordmarks...then whenever we receive letters from the State...we must ask...is that my name?
We know it's not our name, that it's a company, that business is being conducted under such a company that on the system has your face, your biometrics tagged to it. What's my biometrics doing there???
So to remain in honour, you do not even open the letters addressed to The Company/legal person. You send it back, writing back and front "return to sender, addressee unknown". If you are pulled up to courts, then you must strike once and hard.
You must let the Magistrate subtly know that the gig is up. You always remain in honour. Tell them that you want to pay the bill...but my question is...is that my name? Is that English? If it's not English and not my name then...what's this bill please?
Be warned that this is the "Ace In The Hole" i was talking about. Once you go down this road, you will come to a point of no return....I will link here a "recent" video of Romley's that does not appear on the big tech platforms....https://www.bitchute.com/video/JcJr5ZMbp2IK (skip to 23:12 and listen for about 20mins).
GREAT stuff, thanx Jin!! :)
People wonder whether it's possible to still use the legal fiction in the form of setting up private trusts to protect ones's assets and privileges to operate in society (land, property, vehicles, businesses, finances in the bank, pension, employment, marriage, education, travel, etc). If it was a time of relative peace then maybe we could still faff around co-existing with the system.
But as we've seen in the past 2 years alone, good people's money being seized by the "authorities", good people's assets being stripped (using legislation as the cover-up reason)...which goes to show that there is no mercy from the system whatsoever. Private trusts always must operate under legal terms, and the average joe has already been put at a disadvantage since birth, not knowing we have been placed under the wardenship of the State, unless we can return from being lost at sea (meaning, correcting status and leaving Caesar's surname/SURNAME world behind).
Being under the care of the State, we do not dictate the terms of our trust-set ups...as the first trust was set up by the Vatican, and since they created the concept of Trusts, it means they own the entire business of Trusts.
But if we can somehow rid ourselves of the surname control system, we can still hold onto our lands, our property, our businesses to a certain degree. We may not be able to have our "own" bank accounts to do finances, but we shall not be out of pocket due to us playing the 8 Uno card reversing this shit back on them, meaning we no longer are Children of the State. Full grown, knowing our identities and with the knowledge to prove it, the system can do nothing but accept such a standing with a document of their own (the birth cert with no surname - an acknowledgement of this deed of status correction), rendering us our own free people.
All affairs they will handle for us, as they promised us when they set up their Trust-racket. Our signatures create the money, all affiliates with any State establishment regarding our purchasing of property shall be renegotiated, as we now have two culprits that seemingly disconnected, but actually work together. These are the banks and governments (the Banks run this world). The only recourse they have is to to pay up a hefty compensation and in doing so admit to the fraud, which they won't; or they demolish the whole thing and take everything back, allowing you to start a true free man with no surname affiliates to the debtor-office; or they will want to negotiate with you as a "shut-up fee" type of deal, meaning we now dictate to them what we want.