Notice how this is contrary to many popularised mantras. Have you also noticed how unquestionably repeating narratives is widely equated with intelligence? Whilst inconvenient questions are now perceived as scientific and moral negligence. Are the gurus of scientism and the new age leading you towards knowledge and enlightenment, or intellectual and spiritual impotence?
Legal Maxim: "I cannot approve and reject at the same time"
Considering the fact that we are being incrementally nudged towards a position of reliance upon the financial (which is itself a stepping stone towards an intended universal wage) benevolence of government, the above is a very important point of law. Equating to the fact that if you are in receipt of a state benefit, then you have given an implied agreement. The only way to stay outside the system is not to engage with it or accept benefits from it - this is going to become increasingly difficult. Equally, from the perspective of esoteric law, paying into the system makes us complicit in the choices of the system.
Spinning within the socially buffeted windmills of the consensus mind maze, externally downloaded information, the selective "expert opinion", and the shifting sands of common logic, triumph over discernment, experience, intuition, and wisdom.
Like black magic, statute law requires consent, but unless refuted, the power over the individual is assumed to be accepted.
He who is silent when he ought to have spoken and was able to, is taken to agree. Latin proverb
If you fail to claim/state your rights - you are considered to have relinquished them. The law carries the presumption of your incomprehension (submission) and thus will interact with you accordingly. Withholding knowledge is a tactic that has enabled the parasite class to monopolise their grip upon the earth. This control is manifested through the quasi-religious cult of the scribe and blindly administered through the compartmentalised priests of law.
Roman Maxim: He who would be deceived, let him be deceived.”
Source
The Occulted Power of the Jury
Over literally thousands of years of deliberation, they have woven a web that is mystified, overly codified, obtuse, and indecipherable. Leaving the general public in a position of confusion, discombobulation, and a state of beguilement that relegates us to the status of herded helpless victims.
The law utilises the codified maxims of natural law to the benefit of those that are able to comprehend it's veiled implications.
Parliamentary sovereignty is a principle of the UK constitution. It makes Parliament the supreme legal authority in the UK, which can create or end any law. Generally, the courts cannot overrule its legislation and no Parliament can pass laws that future Parliaments cannot change. Parliamentary sovereignty is the most important part of the UK constitution. Parliament UK
The above is a demonstrable falsehood - in truth, it is the people who are the highest law council of the land. Most certainly, whilst occulted and obscured, there is a higher law that is able to govern the statute and legislative laws of government - in the UK this is known as constitutional law. Beyond the facade of voting for different faces of the same machine - this is the true essence of democracy, governance through the power of a jury. The right of the people to scrutinise the laws that shape their destiny.
The conclusion, therefore, is that any government that can for a day enforce its own laws without appealing to the people (or to a tribunal fairly representing the people) for their consent, is, in theory, an absolute government irresponsible to the people, and can perpetuate its power at pleasure. The trial by jury is based upon a recognition of this principle, and therefore forbids the government to execute any of its laws by punishing violators in any case whatever, without first getting the consent of'the country,' or the people, through a jury. In this way, the people at all times, hold their liberties in their own hands, and never surrender them, even for a moment, into the hands of the government. Lysander Spooner: Trial by Jury 1852
1: Demos = People 2: Cracy = Rule. Rule by the people.
In relation to referendums and the democratic vote, it would be remiss not to point out the fly in the ointment - and it relates to the evolving nature of oligarchy sponsored activism and the consensus led control mechanism - i.e communitarianism. The belief that the majority holds some form of intellectual and/or moral authority, is a sleight of hand that is not only increasingly dangerous, it speaks to the nature of mind control, identity politics, emotionally reactive dispositions - and the manipulated path of least resistance (see Covid-19).
Within constitutional law the government is held to account by a jury, which by its very definition involves a process of methodical contemplation, deliberation and close scrutiny. A single juror also possesses the ability to nullify the case. This speaks to the concealed (increasingly diluted) purpose/power of the jury, one that relates to the fact that jurors have ability to judge the legislation that has brought the defendant to court. Thus, even if the defendant is found guilty of violating the legislation/statute that has brought them to judgement - if through their conscience the jury (including a single juror) decide's that it would be unfair to punish the defendant on that basis, they have a legal right of acquittal.
Jury nullification occurs when a jury returns a verdict of "Not Guilty" despite its belief that the defendant is guilty of the violation charged. The jury in effect nullifies a law that it believes is either immoral or wrongly applied to the defendant whose fate they are charged with deciding. Source
That said, observing this from every possible angle -the jury should also be aware that a corrupt judge may attempt to steer their decision. Perhaps this is why within the undiluted medieval system of common law, the judge was akin to a conveyancer (i.e acting in an advisory capacity) - and the power of the jury was absolute.
The living natural law of inalienable rights is wholly different from codified statutes, legislation, and the laws of the dead corporate entity, the latter representing the usurping of the former. Our legal mechanisms speak in a forked tongue that relegates the individual to the status of a pauper. A hidden feudal control mechanism that on an ever-increasing myriad of issues, leaves the flock at the mercy of the wolves.
Capital & Commerce
The veiled financial lubrication of the 4th industrial revolution is the intended commoditisation and capitalisation of every aspect of human thought, action, and interaction, all of which can be utilised as a means of monetary gain. See Microsoft patent WO2020060606. Make no mistake - you are considered to be human capital.
The appropriate definition of capital for Federal budgeting, including: use of capital for the Federal Government itself or the economy at large; owner-ship by the Federal Government or some other entity; defense and non-defense capital; physical capital and intangible or human capital; distinc-tions among investments in and for current, future, and retired workers; distinctions between capital to in-crease productivity and capital to en-hance the quality of life; and existing definitions of capital for budgeting. Mar. 4/ Administration of William J. Clinton, 1997 Source
All of man's interactions are considered to be commerce. The laws of commerce derive from Babylon. Aside from canon law; elements of English law and the refined uniform commercial code (UCC) (which controls bonds, security, transactions) are based upon the codified law of the Shetar, which in turn is derived from Talmudic law. Equally, the laws of commerce have further interconnections with Maritime law.
The fundamental nature of the commercial maxims are the foundational axioms that inform the nature of man's law. Whilst commerce is often perceived as the governance of trade, in the light of the intended communitarian system and associated governance of speech and interaction, it is ever more pertinent to note that commerce encompasses human relationships.
The laws of commerce constitute the rules of a game that few are aware is being played. Keep an eye on the fine print and read until the end
Black’s law dictionary 5th edition page 244
Registration
The registration process carries the potential implication that you’re abandoning your title of ownership. At the cusp of the 4th industrial revolution, registration is also a backhanded way of (slowly but surely) transferring control ("you will own nothing and be happy") to our soulless slave masters. This aspect of the registration process is already evidenced within many modern engines and computer operating systems, that you buy but never wholly own, which (upon registration) are licensed back to you with terms and conditions.
The word bond is derived from the word bondage, and this is what is occurring, the world is being incrementally led into bondage.
To submit carries the legal connotations of submission and voluntary surrender. The word application can be translated to signify that you are a beggar. Thus within this context, we should also be aware that the word carries the presumption that you are aware of what you are relinquishing in order to obtain what you are begging for.
What we have is a ritualistic system of legal sorcery that’s based upon curses, sacrifices, and the voluntary surrender (submission) of your God-given rights. These are the legal ties that bind us and blind us.
Some consider the Zohar to be the basic book of Judaic magic, but in fact, itself the Talmud focuses heavily on sorcery, demonology, astrology, necromancy. Chabad Founder: Rebbe Schneur Zalam.
Source
Registering A Birth
There is a shadow system of control that operates behind the veil of perception. Either you see it, or you don't, and if you won't, you never will.
Through process and legislation we can observe the subversive infiltration of natural law. The usurpation of your God-given (inalienable) rights begins from the very moment your parents submit an application to register your birth. Here in England the birth certificate carries the Crown copyright stamp upon it, signalling that it is owned by the Crown.
The birth registration gives the child their legal name, a process that turns the child into an entity (legal person/estate/trading name) on a registrar - see my previous statements on commerce. Once registered, the legal entity enters the realm of lawful conveyance (both benefits and liabilities), statutes, and commercial agreements. The legal title also displays that the child is now the property of the state, hence why the birth certificate displays the Mother/Father not as a parent, but as an informant. Equally, as per the occultic nature of the English language, are you parents or a pair that rent? If there is a veiled truth in that statement - who are you renting your children from? The state?
Interestingly, the Phoenicians were known as masters of language and linguistic manipulation. Within the English language their influence is discernible to this very day - we speak on a telephone, when someone is deceptive they are commonly known as being phoney.
Phonetics is a branch of linguistics that studies how humans produce and perceive sounds. Source
The twenty-two characters of the Phoenician script revolutionized the written language. Source
The Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666 (lost at sea rules) equates to the fact that after seven years an unclaimed person would be considered as dead. In order to take advantage of the person being traded as a commodity, in the 1700s (as a means of being traded before the age of seven) all birth registrations carried the presumption that the individual was considered lost at sea. Thus, unless this assumption is refuted, it implies that the birth certificate is actually a certificate of death.
The corporate fiction of YOU is distinguished from the living you by the fact that all official governmental/legal letters are in upper case capitals. When ewe are “summoned to appear” in court, is the living you being resurrected? Certainly, an interesting choice of words
Whilst your birth certificate could be considered as an incorporated legal fiction, a traded legal fiction that is akin to a financial future for the state. Equally, contrary to popularised misconception and calculated manipulation, you cannot make a claim against a fiction. There is no pot of gold waiting for you, and anyone that tells you otherwise, is either misled, or attempting to mislead.
.
Although it is perceived as against the law not to register a birth (an obligation), by registering through consent (we will consent to every aspect of our enslavement) at a deeper level it displays that the child was given to the state of our freewill. Equally, under the guise of public health screening - over the last fifty years and throughout the western world, every newborn child has had a sample of their blood taken. A grey area being why is it stored indefinitely? Who has a right of ownership? And what is it being used for?
Source
Source
Source
At birth, through a neonatal pinprick, the blood of the child is taken and oft indefinitely retained (largely without parental consent) sometimes within what was widely known as a Guthrie card, and latterly on a DNA database. Their desired global database and the genomic sequencing of babies carry similar implications. Indeed, as I shall document in later chapters, there is a movement toward some form of genomic patented ownership of the individual.
Source
Source
Freedom?
The UN human rights act removes human rights under the guise of being a person whose rights are subject to the diktats of law. A totalitarian law that dictates that all rights come with a responsibility to the global to local community. The implied moral consensus of communitarian law, manufactures collective consent to bypass the inalienable individual (sovereign) rights of natural law. Unfortunately, equality without individual sovereignty is the path toward a totalitarian technocracy.
The citizen is leased their freedom from their rulers, their government decreed citizens "rights & privileges," (which include imprisonment and taxation) remaining subject to "corresponding duties". As we are currently observing, privileges are licensed, regulated, and reinterpreted to suit the will of the government. If you are given your freedom by a controlling entity, then in essence this pseudo freedom is a contradiction in terms.
Do you think you are free to speak?
Human Rights Act
At an esoteric level, the more corrupt and violent we are, the more inflammatory our discourse, and the further we can be nudged toward the extremities of our worldviews, the more they can justify ever tighter restrictions on our pseudo freedom.
You can't be given freedom, but of your free will you are free to give it away. Alas, this control mechanism has become so ingrained, that the vast majority of people are unable to coherently cognitise the chains that bind them, to decipher what freedom truly means, to discern the self-responsibility of a free society. True freedom comes before life because if you don’t have freedom, at a fundamental level you have submitted to a life not worth living.
Are we looking at grimoires of grammatical deception and spell-binding textual trickery? A hidden language of contracts and symbols that harks back to ancient Babylon, Egypt (whose hieroglyphs are the parent of Latin), and onwards into Rome? I think there is some validity to that statement, but also a great deal of misdirection, misconception and incomprehension.
We should also be aware that this is an ongoing process of procedural awareness, communication, and assertion, not a singular magical formula that will unravel the world's control mechanisms. I'm equally keen to point out that there is a great deal of manipulation and subversion within both sides of this argument.
Signature equates to sign of nature, when you vote you are asked to leave an X in the appropriate box. Historically the X is the signature of the illiterate and thus carries connotations of a power of attorney..
Whilst “the legal truth may set you free” it is also a web that is incredibly well hidden and legally justified. It is a discipline (and a comprehension of your right's within the legal process) that will take many years and much research to unravel and comprehend. By virtue of its name, the occultic undercurrents of law are incredibly difficult to define and quantify.
Govern = rule Ment = Mind. Government = rulers of mind.
To my mind, self-proclaimed "freemen" and common law experts proclaiming your rights to renege on your financial obligations, are to be avoided! If you aren’t in full possession of all the facts and legal idiosyncrasies you will be laughed out of court with your shirt torn from your back. Beware of those handing out writs and steering people into a confrontational cul-de-sac, for within tactical communitarianism, these individuals will be used as a means of tarnishing and isolating a means of valid recourse.
In the wake of Covid-19's armchair law analysts, and globalist-controlled anti-globalists like Extinction Rebellions Gail Bradbrook advising her followers not pay their mortgages, I expect to see multiple court cases decided at the detriment of the defendant. Box smart and play clever, become your own expert, do not follow the perceptual pied pipers that will lead you and your family towards financial oblivion.
Source
The Devil Is In The (Double Accounting) Detail
The trap many fall into is labeling double entry a 14th century "invention" - this is quite simply not true.
The base structure at the heart of modern banking evolved from the Venetian system of double entry book-keeping. In turn, for the readers of the first two chapters - perhaps it shouldn't come as too much of a surprise that the Venetian system of double entry, derives from alchemical/Hermetic principles. The Corpus Hermeticum was first translated into Latin by humanist philosopher, priest, and astrologer - Marsilio Ficino. The patron of Ficino being one Cosimo de Medici, the ruler of the Florentine republic (I previously noted that Florence's 600 richest bloodlines have remained so since the 1400's) and progeny of the aforementioned financial and political dynasty immortalised as the House Of Medici.
Page 12: Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic tradition by Frances Yates
The House Of Medici sponsored the Platonic academy that was headed by Ficini. It was here that the Hermetica began to grow in popularity, stoking the fires of the renaissance and garnering the attention of Fra Luca Bartolomeo de Pacioli - a collaborator of Leonardo Davinci. Widely known as the father of bookkeeping and accounting, de Pacioli was the first person to publish a book of double accounting - in turn, bringing the concept to global prominence and changing the course of human history.
Pacioli dramatically affected the practice of accounting by describing the double-entry accounting method used in parts of Italy. This revolutionized how businesses oversaw their operations, enabling improved efficiency and profitability. The Summa's section on accounting was used internationally as an accounting textbook up to the mid-16th century. The essentials of double-entry accounting have for the most part remained unchanged for over 500 years. Source
The base Hermetic principle of alchemical dualism/double perception (manifest within the aforementioned Hegelian dialectic) and the union of opposites resides at the heart of the monetary system. Within each book entry, the transaction is dissolved into a pair of opposites - debit/feminine and credit/masculine. Upon determination of profit the polarities are coagulated into a single number - the union/transcension of the contradiction.
"Gender is in everything; everything has its Masculine and Feminine Principles; Gender manifests on all planes."--The Kybalion.
Venetian bookkeepers inverted the binary law that resides at the heart of Magick and divination - thus, within double entry, assets/positive/masculine/black are now displayed on the left and liabilities/negative/feminine/red, on the right. That said, the reversal of left/right symbolism derives from the binary mechanisms at the heart of Mesopotamian divination and dream interpretation. In this instance, their reversal often alludes to a deeper layer of symbolic pattern and omen that speaks to the context of the observation. Indeed, double accounting was not only used as a means of concealing the crime of usury, it was oft perceived to negate its connotations of sin. Indeed, within divination, both the principle of reversal and the double occurrence speak to esoteric law, the inversion of left/right symbology alluding to an ideology where a negative becomes a positive. I refer you to the aforementioned law of inversion.
in Šumma Izbu a malformation on the right side (normally the pars familiaris) is considered negative, a malformation on the left (normally the pars hostilis), positive. This is owed to the context of the observation: a malformation being eo ipso a negative sign, the normal meaning of the opposition right (“favourable”) / left (“unfavourable”) is inverted.
Pages 46-48, 52-53“The Omen Series Šumma Izbu: Internal Structure and Hermeneutic Strategies” by Nicla De Zorzi.
Staying with the manipulation of the binary system, we can also consider a self-ingratiating perversion of the sacred marriage - the offspring of which being the generation of institutional wealth. The marriage of two opposite principles - between the lender (masculine) and the borrower (feminine) officiated by the priests of banking and sealed with a legally binding contract. The creation of wealth manifested through absorbing the interactions of saver and debtor into the body of the institution - the controlled flow of opposing polarities expanding the affluence (currency) of the financial entity. See my previous observations on the esoteric nature of the masculine and feminine
Good is on the right, evil on the left, but the supreme excellence is above both. Page 46: Transcendental Magick its doctrine and ritual.
Within double entry asset accounting we can also consider the base principle at the heart of the law of inversion - a manipulation of language and perception and a transgression against traditional values. In this instance a debit adds to an account whilst a credit subtracts. Conversely, for a liability account the opposite is true, i.e we are observing a union of contradictions.
A debit to an asset account means that the business owns more (i.e. increases the asset), and a credit to an asset account means that the business owns less (i.e. reduces the asset). Source
Source
The Hermetic/Kabbalistic heritage of double entry was utilised as a means of concealing/justifying the then (immoral) criminal offence of usury - an all consuming inter-generational Trojan horse . Interestingly, Hermes has historically been equated with being the god of tricksters, thieves, and commerce.
double-entry bookkeeping, born of the prohibition of interest-bearing loans and the need for credit, is a complete definition of value. Its invention, from 1211 to 1340, and its subsequent expansion among Italian merchants, led to the transformation of these merchants into merchant-bankers and made them the managers of a new credit system destined to a prodigious expansion: the system of claims exchanged by bills of exchange in the great European fairs.
Source
Of course, in the sense of delegating manual labour and your working hours, the more money you have the more time you can buy. If you have the finances to look after your health, the more years you may live. Equally, on the macro scale - whoever controls the monetary supply has the ability to harvest, harness, and (mis) direct humanities creative potential - i.e the essence of the human spirit. If this is true, then what it is being directed towards? Beyond the limitations of an individuals identity/perception lifetime/career - what is the endgame? What are they building?
Time is now money! How many minutes of your day are owned by someone else? Do you give them willingly or begrudgingly? Let's pause to consider some interesting spell-ings that I've collected along the way.
We awake in the morning to earn a living, but we live for the weekend. Conversely, a wake is a gathering for the dead, the attendees of which are in mourning, urns contain the ashes of the deceased, and our jobs are often described as undertakings. Job is the Hebrew word for persecuted, and for our toils we receive the weak end of the deal - original author Laurel Airica.
But "I love my job" - fair point, I commend anyone that holds down a job and finds their vocation - respect to you. That said, we don't live in a free market economy, we live under a regime of crony capitalist. corporate socialist (communitarian) usury, so ultimately, who are you paying to live?
Source
Above we can observe a British five pound note - look at the wording underneath Winston Churchill's tie.
Furthermore, with a banking practice whose formative base seemingly correspond with the veiled principles of sex magick - we could be forgiven for considering its nature as parasitic. As with the adept who tricks his female consort into believing she is receiving his seed whilst stealing her essence, the lender fakes his deposit/liability and reneges on his side of the bargain. As security he now possesses claims of ownership over tangible assets, land, property, and if the borrower is working to replay the debt - time and the associated creative energy - gynergy. An energy harvesting matrix of epic proportions and profound implications.
Have you heard the one about how the system is f***king you over? Well it is, figuratively, royally, ritually, and literally! Sounds crazy?
Due to the fact that every asset is required to have a corresponding liability - money is created as both. To the banking institution (and vice versa) the created money is unified as both a liability (to be repaid by the customer) and an asset for them to spend. Unfortunately, this is a sleight of hand, for as highlighted below, banks fake their liability by being able to create money out of nothing. Thus, the borrower is paying interest on something that never existed in the first place. Correspondingly, through the acquisition of interest, the banking institution is able to purchase real world assets. Equally, is the money you pay into your account a deposit - or a loan to the bank?
Thus it can now be said with confidence for the first time – possibly in the 5000 years' history of banking - that it has been empirically demonstrated that each individual bank creates credit and money out of nothing, when it extends what is called a ‘bank loan’. The bank does not loan any existing money, but instead creates new money. Source
Congratulations, your post has been curated by @techclub
Manually curated by @samhenrytenplus
Thank you very much :)
Thanx for another great chapter.
No problem, I bring it up to date next chapter, cia , operation Gladio etc etc. :)
Am about to post a documentary you should be very interested in.
Thanks for giving me the heads up! :)
Thought this little gem of comedic truth fits perfect with your excellently presented research.
I was sharing his early vids in 2020 which were a breath of fresh air at the time. He got a bit boring in 21 tho but looks like he's back with a vengeance.
Don't know if you've seen this one one - but its also worth a watch. :)
That was great. Thanks for sharing.
Haha! Great stuff - he get's it! :D Comedy has been weaponised for many years - it's great to see people turning the tables. lol
Just the laugh I needed to ease me into my Monday morning - thank you for sharing.